Promo for the Series finale of Battlestar Galactica, Daybreak 2.
Also, Lee tries to murder a pidgeon.
I have a lot more to add so check back.
SevorTB: thanks for the videos.
Ron Moore is on the verge of joining a rarefied group of showrunners who have successfully pulled off the most
ambitious of TV formats: the heavily serialized drama. Part 1 of the
series finale of his Peabody Award-winning reimagination of "Battlestar
Galactica" on Sci Fi Channel airs tonight.
As with “The
Sopranos” and “The Shield,” fans are eagerly anticipating the finale
and fretting whether it can live up to their expectations.
Below,
Moore talks about the last episode, networks shying away from serials,
J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek" remake and the one genre he'd like to tackle
next.
THR: How do you think fans will react to the “Battlestar” finale?
Moore:
I don’t know. I’m sure there will be a lot of discussion. They have a
lot of different expectations for what they think it’s going to be, and
a lot of opinions about how it should be. All of us who worked on the
finale feel good about it, that this is the ending of the story we
wanted to make.
THR: Is there any chance of doing something with
these same characters that takes place either before or after this
series finale? Or is this It?
Moore: We did a standalone movie called “The Plan.” But there’s no plans to do anything else with the “Galactica” cast.
THR:
You constantly have to make creative decisions on the fly on a show.
Can you name one thing that – time machine available – you would have
done differently?
Moore: There’s a bunch of things here and
there. Plot lines and subplots, that’s the cost of doing business. You
take risks and go on instinct and you look back and say that paid off
and that didn’t.
THR: Anything specific?
Moore: Probably
we rushed into the Lee and Duala romance too quickly and didn’t lay the
groundwork for that. “Black Market” was an episode I wish I had a
second crack at. We probably played around with Lee’s character and his
direction a little bit before settling into a good track with him. On
the other hand, I don’t know that’s entirely a bad thing, because it
added to his quest and trying to figure out his own place on the show.
THR:
Watching the recent episode where Ellen and Anders explained the show’s
mythology, I wondered about the choice to make four characters cylons.
Have you been satisfied with the way that’s played out?
Moore: Yeah, I’ve been satisfied with that.
THR: Universal is developing a “Battlestar” movie with original series creator Glen Larson. How do you feel about that?
Moore:
More power to them. I don’t know anything about it; they didn’t talk to
me about it. I’ve always said if somebody wanted to do a continuation
of the original, that’s fine by me. It doesn’t have anything to do with
what we’ve done.
THR: You also have the pilot “Virtuality” at Fox. Last we heard it was being recut. How’s it looking?
Moore: They haven’t officially turned it down, they haven’t officially moved it forward. We’ll just have to wait and see.
THR: Any update on the theatrical remake of “The Thing” you’re writing?
Moore:
It’s in development. I’ve done my drafts, they’ve hired a director and
we’re just waiting to see if Universal will greenlight it.
THR: As a person who used to write for “Star Trek” shows, what do you think of the new movie, from what you’ve seen?
Moore:
I’m very encouraged. I salute them for going back to the beginning and
revitalizing it. I think that’s exactly what the franchise needed.
THR:
You’re also working on the “Battlestar” prequel series “Caprica,” which
you’ve described as a more terrestrial-based drama. Are you concerned
“Battlestar” fans will be like, “Where are the space battles?"
Moore:
I’m sure there will be a contingent of fans that won’t appreciate it
because it doesn’t have those elements, but that’s OK. It was a
calculated risk, and we’re hoping to gather fans who don’t
traditionally come to this genre as well. There’s a chunk of people out
there who hold sci-fi at arm’s length, and this is an opportunity to
bring them in. And I think most people who enjoyed “Battlestar” watched
it for the character interactions and the stories with the
action-adventure components as icing on the cake. They
probably didn’t show up every week hoping something will blow up.
THR:
There’s a push among broadcast networks toward close-ended,
non-serialized shows -- like crime procedurals -- the idea being that
serialized dramas are increasingly high-risk.
Moore: I think
they’ve always been high-risk and networks have always had an aversion
to it. Network executives generally live in fear, and their fear is
always that (the viewer is) going to be confused. It’s unfortunate
because some of the greatest shows have been serialized and featured
continuing
characters. Audiences of serialized shows tend to become
avid and dedicated viewers interested in exploring the show’s universe
online and consumers of additional merchandising. I think network
executives are somewhat myopic because they go for the easiest answer.
“Let's make it tidy and all wrapped-up so the audience doesn't have to
remember what happened last week.” The audience is smart. They like
catching up on things. They have a wide menu of ways at this point to
catch up on shows. It just doesn’t seem like it's the big scary monster
a lot of networks would have you believe.
THR: Is there a type of TV show that you haven’t done that you’ve always wanted to do?
Moore: Yeah. I’ve always wanted to do a Western.
THR: A lot of TV showrunners, when asked their favorite shows, list "Battlestar." What shows are you watching right now?
I
tend to watch a lot of "Seinfeld," news programming, "Mad Men" -- and
I’m looking forward to "Breaking Bad." I watch Bill Maher, Charlie
Rose, "Project Runway" and "Top Chef." I don’t watch a lot of [dramas]
other than what I just named, mostly because there’s a part of my brain
going ‘how many sets have they used?’ It’s not as entertaining; I get
analytical and it becomes work.
THR: Legacy question: Is there anything about sci-fi shows that you think “Galactica” has changed?
Moore:
One of the goals going into it (was) we wanted to make a sci-fi show
that was relevant and spoke to our times and dealt with real issues
that approached the drama in a naturalistic way and made it “real.” If
we’re able to define a legacy of asking other shows to do the same in
the genre and keep sci fi going in a way that tackles meaningful ideas
and challenge audience expectations, I think that would be a great
thing.


Comments